>"So any statement in this thread that heritability somehow constrains the expression of g or of IQ is actually conceptually incorrect."
Then perhaps you can provide an example in which a rat's g is raised to that of the average Berkley student. About 5% of their DNA is different from ours, but since heritable constraints are "conceptually incorrect", surely the right environment would do it, wouldn't it?
Then perhaps you can provide an example in which a rat's g is raised to that of the average Berkley student. About 5% of their DNA is different from ours, but since heritable constraints are "conceptually incorrect", surely the right environment would do it, wouldn't it?