Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I worry about that too. In addition, I haven't seen any confidence that HKT can be implemented in a backwards compatible way, and that is one of the most-requested features (along with Async IO). I would hate to have to wait around for a 2.0 for this stuff.


  > I haven't seen any confidence that HKT can be implemented 
  > in a backwards compatible way
Because nobody has ever managed to propose a design for HKT. How can you possibly future-proof against a feature with no clear idea as to its shape?


The team has actually been pretty careful to design in a HKT-compatible way. While there isn't a fully-fleshed out design yet for Rust, there are designs in other languages, and we've looked at their pitfalls to make sure we can avoid them.

For example, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/213#issuecomment-6575...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: