Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
Rusky
on Jan 9, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Announcing Rust 1.0 Alpha
If you want closer performance characteristics and simpler use patterns, in the meantime, storing the parent GameObject by value rather than through a pointer might be easier.
snake_case
on Jan 9, 2015
[–]
For some reason I had pointers on the mind. You're right, no real use for pointers in that scenario. Storing by value makes more sense.
Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
