Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Says the person who thinks that "Disputing definitions is pointless", and implies that definition_yummyfajitas is no worse than any other definition.



Asking what a person means when they use a word is not pointless - it's the only way to understand what they believe about the world. If you say "sound" and precisely define it as "auditory perceptions by a human", I then understand what you mean when you say "a tree falls in the forest and makes no sound". If you don't define "sound", then I might think you mean "a tree falling in the forest creates no vibrations in the air".

In contrast, using the word "vibrations" or "fred" instead of "sound" doesn't change the physical behavior of the air. That's why disputing definitions is pointless.


Okay, what do you think "systemic" means? What does "pointless" mean to you? What's a "vibration"? Are you a 'person' and how can I tell?

You just used all those words, and I would like you to educate me.


Pointless means we'll achieve nothing by doing it. I don't know what "systemic" means which is why I asked. A vibration is an oscillation in a medium.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: