Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Basically FreeBSD and NetBSD are better as long as you don't connect them to Internet.

In particular FreeBSD security is so abysmal, once you plug it to the internet you can't really say is your computer anymore.

Edit: Downvote this: Windows Vista had ASLR and latest FreeBSD 10 does not.




Yes, it's impossible to hack an OS if it has ASLR /s

OpenBSD has the most secure marketing message of all the BSDs. It begins and ends there. Stop banging drums, fanboys.

edit: why can't we all just get along?


Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Where is yours?


Check any CTF or hacking contest (like Defcon CTF) They use FreeBSD as a playground.


The last time I saw FreeBSD used in a CTF, it was FreeBSD 6, back in the Kenshoto days. FreeBSD has come a long way since then.

Nowadays, other than the odd ARM problem, or esoteric reversing challenge, everything is Linux. It doesn't matter anyway, though, since CTFs are designed with the express purpose of being insecure.

I'm as big a fan of OpenBSD as anyone, but there's no reason someone couldn't intentionally cripple OpenBSD to use as a platform for CTFs.


I've only been playing CTFs for 2 years (iCTF 2013), but I don't think I've seen FreeBSD there once. In my experience, it's 99% Linux, with some occasional Windows and Android. Then there was last ruCTFe making a point of using some more obscure systems - Minix, OpenIndiana, etc.


The team that won the Collegiate Cyber Defense Nationals last year did so with a firewall based on freebsd (pfSense).

https://hackucf.org/blog/pfsense-at-hackucf/




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: