Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

arq (which we love) + rsync.net = success.

We have a "HN readers" discount which is fairly substantial.



= success

rsync.net is 20x more expensive than Google Nearline ($0.20/GB).

Why would anyone choose to use it for Arq when Arq supports both?


While I personally don't mind Google having all my backup data, we must appreciate the fact that in this post-Snowden world some people will justifiably refuse to go with the big USA-corp players like Amazon or Google.

rsync.net just saying: "Hey, we're not Google or Amazon" is already a big selling point for some.


I encourage you to email us and ask about the HN readers discount.

Further, Amazon S3 is a better comparison, as far as pricing goes - we're fully live, online, random access storage - not nearline or weirdline like google/glacier.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: