I wouldn't want people to conclude that coverage was a useless metric based on this, but it does seem to support the idea that chasing code coverage dogmatically is not necessarily the best use of your time.
But a coverage ratio and/or browsing annotated source is a good feedback mechanism for how many tests you've written.
I wouldn't want people to conclude that coverage was a useless metric based on this, but it does seem to support the idea that chasing code coverage dogmatically is not necessarily the best use of your time.