To be fair the designer who created the font would probably agree that for use cases like passwords or serial numbers etc. you should use a different font. That's the nice thing about having different fonts around. You can choose which one you want to use.
That is a solution applicable for a document or GUI created by yourself, where you can define various styles with associated fonts and use them appropriately.
However, I see the worst offenders on various Web pages (frequently for various URLs) where I do not control the typeface, unless I instruct the browser to ignore the style sheet of the rendered Web page and use my own fonts instead, which can be tedious or create other problems in the rendered page.
There are a lot of mediocre therapists out there. And even if you do get a reasonably good one, they might not click with you in terms of personality/approach/cultural background.
It's sad that people are so utterly resigned to having an ineffective federal legislature that the possibility of restricting the use of binding arbitration by means of the passage of new laws is not even considered.
Given their conclusion, how do you fix a system like this? Start over from scratch? What does that look like? edit... Maybe it's the American Anti Corruption Act? https://anticorruptionact.org
>What do our findings say about democracy in America? They certainly constitute troubling news for advocates of “populistic” democracy, who want governments to respond primarily or exclusively to the policy preferences of their citizens. In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule—at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes.When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover,because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.
"During the Second World War, [the] university patented the homogenisation of cheese milk and attempted to have charges levied on Danish cheese produced using homogenised milk. Their attempts failed, as it could be proved that this method had been introduced 20 years earlier in Denmark by Marius Boe."
I always assumed that was somewhat normal of ag schools... is it that unique? Aside from the weird "can of cheese" of course -- I mean, is it uncommon for ag schools to sell their produce like that?
Based on my examination of my own attitudes about China, I'd say unease/fear about the future actions of the Chinese government may fuel some of my desire to criticize it for issues I may otherwise be indifferent to. While this fear is not based on some underlying dread of the Han people, it is, perhaps, motivated by nationalist instincts that many might disparage.
Self-preservation, especially in the face of a group diametrically opposed to your culture's values, isn't something to be ashamed of. Nationalism is not evil when it is defined inclusively, and not based on immutable characteristics.
I would go further and say that while we shouldn't be ashamed of nationalism, we should draw our boundary wider. We should say that we are proud of, and willing to support, the values we uphold and all people that uphold them, regardless of what country they happen to live in. The people of Hong Kong, for instance, are in serious jeopardy. Simply acquiescing to the influence of the Chinese government allows them to steamroll ever more people, and silence ever more voices in favor of the values countless people have fought and died for.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle" - Edmund Burke
My only long term fear with China is what happens if it collapses. It might last another 100+ years, but dictatorship + immense corruption is not a recipe for stability. China’s internal politics has changed a lot since 1976 and it’s still evolving rapidly.
