I think of them in terms of the adapter pattern. It would be great if I could talk directly to the SME on the other end of my problem, but the interface I'm going through is the interface for everything so the first layer you hit is the facade with a bunch of adapters that don't know much about the implementation behind the interfaces they're trying to get your message to.
When my father started working at the St. Lucie nuclear power plant in ~1988 they had just gotten rid of a shipment of tape dispensers that arrived too hot to be kept on site.
>We see this in a very specific case, which is in the onset of heart problems. So basically its a more nuanced finding. The finding is not quite as strong.
The one divorce I can think of in my extended family came from the onset of heart problems. Properly speaking, it was the abortion she had that caused the divorce, not the fact that she would have died otherwise.
~43% of first marriages fail, ~60% of second marriages, ~73% third marriages. Lots of people are emotionally unhealthy and barely equipped to adult, let alone have the grit, fortitude, and luck to make a partnership work for life. It is the hardest job you’ll ever have. The divorce rate is understandable considering the partnership expectations outcome mismatch in the aggregate.
Suppose he really wanted kids and learned she couldn't have any. It wouldn't exactly be "until death do we part", but I think much of western society has already abandoned that standard anyway
My goal was a lifelong marriage. My mentality constantly evolved toward that goal.
However, my judgment was insufficient and I didn't properly recognize that sustaining the marriage was harming our kids.
In an earlier time, the harm would have been much less. Kids (my generation & earlier) once had direct, relationship-level access to a number of caring, invested adults - related and not.
My kids had the two of us 24/7 and that's about it. My wife and I had 10x the parenting demands (time) put upon us that my parents, grandparents-> adults through human history had.
Hm. Male with heart problems here. I am in a happy relationship now but dating has been hard in the past due to not being able do do certain things normally expected of men.
The main concern I see with "technologic" wombs is who is then responsible for the upbringing and care of the fetus until it because viable to live on its own? If someone gives up a fetus but is still force to be financially responsible for it, more harmful and destructive forms abortion will be, by necessity, be used.
My use of “unburdened” includes financial in all variations, even sealing the ability of the subsequent child to find the parents.
It’s pretty clear that it will be the state who assumes receivership of the fetus and subsequent human with full constitutional rights.
It’s also a pretty easy legislative problem to say the state is transferring unwanted fetuses, despite the technology for its viability not currently existing. The outcome shifts the burden of guilt - or lack thereof - away from the parent(s), over to an immune state regardless of that state’s laws on abortion. And it shifts priorities and funding measures on creating the technology to ensure a fetus’ viability, whether that turns out to be a fool's errand or not.
This will easily bridge consensus between “camps” as the discomfort over citizens killing fetus turns into a market choice instead of a legislative debate. What will the market primarily choose to end a pregnancy
Who is responsible for incubator babies until they are viable to leave the incubator? That's already a limited sort of artificial womb. The state picks up the bill I suppose, if everybody else decides to bail.
The problem is how energy is produced. You're offering solutions at what I think is the wrong end. Pigouvian tax things causing the problems at the point of extraction and let the free market respond to that. The negative externalities have to be realized by the market.
Why does he keep putting "misinformation" and "disinformation" in quotes like that?
He says something about those terms having been invented by folks at the #1 organization on the list, but... are we to believe Google Ngram is part of the plot?
>What the Mueller investigation didn’t accomplish in ousting Trump from office
What? That's not what the order said the investigation was supposed to do. It also didn't accomplish world peace or end famine.
I don't what Taibbi is trying to accomplish, but misunderstanding and miscommunication allow evil into the world.
