Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | michaelvoz's comments login

As it should be? It is disgusting, offers no benefit, creates a ton of plastic waste and gets children hooked to nicotine.


Vaping high quality CBD cartridges helped me through some serious situational depression and anxiety.

Of course some people told me that vaping was a "trash" thing to do, but thankfully I don't care and recognize that my needs are valid regardless of peoples' judgements!


Why not move to the crystal isolate? You can add those to food or your drinks. Not sure vaping makes sense cbd wise when there are different options.


It offered me the benifit of being the first successful eat to quit smoking two packs a day. I haven't had a cigarette in years, but I vape.


Disgusting? Truly? Everything else I’ll agree with you on, but disgusting isn’t a descriptor I associate with vaping. Certainly not in comparison to cigarettes!


>offers no benefit

Got me off of cigarettes. Seems like a pretty huge benefit to me.


People shouldn't be on them to begin with.


Wow, looks like you just solved it! You should go out and preach your gospel to all smokers, drinkers, and beef eaters. While you're at it please solve climate change and make everyone be nice to one another.


You're committing a logical fallacy with your response. Each of those issues you listed are different from the rest.


Yeah well obviously they are, but I always do love an HN "oh logical fallacy I win!" response.

My point is that your approach helps no one and has failed time and time again in the past. Remember D.A.R.E? How about abstinence health ed. programs? "Just say no" doesn't work. People like their vices. When a healthier alternative comes along it's a good thing.


Maybe in the US, but abstinence works in other countries. There should be investigations into why that is the case.


Agreed. Smoking and vaping are zero benefit activities that harm people and the environment. There should be a complete ban on smoking of all sorts.


Vaping as an alternative to smoking offers considerable benefits.


Agree entirely that it’s disgusting and attracts kids to the habit.

Problem is kids do stupid things and who has the right to decide for me if I get to do something disgusting?

Bigger issue for me is the talk of socialized healthcare where I’d have to pay the healthcare bills for people who smoke. Why should I have to pay for their bad habit?


Better late than never?


Not much comfort to the thousands (millions?) of people that may have found some comfort in these drugs.


But a lot of comfort to the future millions of the people who would have had the same frustrating experience as the previous generation who couldn't find the comfort in those drugs due to their criminalization.


True, but could be millions more.


Made even more difficult by the fact that the current generation did not "do the deed" so to speak. In your example of Palestinians or Native Americans - the "occupiers" were born here, this is their home now, the original conquering generation is very much gone, what solution can there be?


> In your example of Palestinians... the "occupiers" were born here, this is their home now, the original conquering generation is very much gone

Nothing could be further from the truth.

https://www.amnestyusa.org/lets-be-clear-israels-long-runnin...


Much of that conflict is about things that were done generations ago. True, recent and current actions also fit the bill, but it is disingenuous to claim that the settlement activity is the primary mover of the situation.

One thing that link throws around is the word "illegal". There are customs and treaties, but there is not a world government to enforce the rule of law for these treaties. Many of the definitions like "occupied territory" are up for debate as well. It just doesn't come down to a clear set of rules and an authority to enforce them.


>One thing that link throws around is the word "illegal". There are customs and treaties, but there is not a world government to enforce the rule of law for these treaties

The inability to enforce a law does not make a crime legal. The occupied territories are a violation of international law, even if they are never punished for them.


Calling something a crime when there is no rule of law to enforce it and no legal authority with jurisdiction is simply a contradiction in terms.


The UN has both, and has called the settlements crimes many times. A punishment could be handed down if certain states allowed it to happen.


I too, see Little My.


No, that is patently untrue. Please provide sources for your claim.


He did - the source is "a book". Assumedly The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.


Seems like standard boilerplate.


IPO takes months and months of effort and planning. It is not as short term as you seem to imply.


Which is why they're hurrying to get them done now, before things get bad?

It does seem like there are a number of them, but maybe that's just my impression. Anyone got numbers?


Also looks like they are already profitable, and growing like crazy.

EDIT: my bad interpreting the loss format, they are not profitable.


> We have incurred operating losses in the past, expect to incur operating losses in the future, and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future

> We have incurred operating losses each year since our inception in 2012, including net losses of $(71.1) million, $(47.9) million, and $(195.6) million for fiscal 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, and expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.

They've never been profitable.


My mistake, I interpreted the $(...) values as being negative losses.


Look at their contribution margins though. Especially on subs. Unit economics are, I guess unsurprisingly, fantastic on selling 2k bikes with a ~40$ monthly sub.


They're operating at a -25% EBITDA, so no they are not.


So does a major recession.


?? So don't buy an iPhone? It's their ecosystem. You are owed nothing.


> So don't buy an iPhone?

You don't get to choose which phone the customer for your app already bought.


Well hold on a minute with that enthusiasm there pardner!

If anti-trust is on the table it's the government who will be deciding whose ecosystem it is and exactly who owes what to whom.


Encarta had a time and place when I, as a child, had access to disks and wikipedia did not exist yet. What is the point today? Vastly inferior in terms of content by volume, controlled by a single corporation with black box changes to articles (as opposed to Wikipedia's history tracking), impossible to dynamically update after release... I could go on.

Edit: I absolutely cannot stand the smarmy "I wrote code that you use" on his homepage. Sorry buddy, you probably don't.


1) Disappointing HN thread - all about race and little about article?

2) Disappointing article. No depth at all. How is the money spent? How many bees are there? Where does one get bees? Are there flowers around for the bees? How did this person get into beekeeping? Why beekeeping and not, say, an organic garden?

3) Disappointing site - tons of flashing banners and ads everywhere.

What sounds like an awesome, uplifting story that may be replicate-able across the country was turned into an overall disappointing puff piece.


I had the same thought, I read the article to see if that was a thing, like black hat hackers. Turns out in the US, they find amazing that black people can be beekeeepers like white people. And yes, I checked who wrote the article, but it is probably a way of thinking that is shared nationwide.


Right? People raise bees. The people may be black. They may be white. They may be yellow. Or Brown. The people might me muslim, or jewish, or atheist. The bees don't care, and neither do I. I have no idea why it matters.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: