Only the right to birth is specified in the constitution. Clean air, livable temperature, conserved sea levels, etc. are not protected by the constitution, is not in our country's history and traditions, etc....
If you had to choose between the wars brought on by a degenerate financial system pursuing fossil fuels, or fossil fuel powered deflationary assets for longer term global wealth storage - which would you pick?
Bitcoin does not make the "energy problem" worse - the opposite is true in most cases. Here's a good example; it pushes the excess energy waste coming off of fossil fuel plants into a stable financial exchange system instead of bleeding it off for no reason.
Bitcoin is also not just a "deflationary asset" - the entire point is that you now have an instantaneous transfer financial backbone as opposed to needing a central bank's money printer to back your country so before another country decides they need your natural resources, you can actually purchase infrastructure and participate in the global economy and profit off of what you have instead.
What happens to countries that hold US dollar when the banks start printing? Where do they want to purchase assets, and who divests from their domestic assets?
What an absolutely unread take on it - and what a great representative of the closest approximation to average research done on the topic.
"Q: Why is nothing from the Windows XP source code leak added?
A: Even though Microsoft has only taken down a few Windows modifications, they will most definitely take Windows XP Delta Edition down if there is a reference to the source code inside it. The Windows XP source code is illegal to download, fork, and redistribute, so nothing from it will ever be added."
Agreed that Chess is mostly about memorization, even at a high level - opening theory has only gotten deeper with the invention of computer analysis. If you're looking for a game that fits that criteria (deterministic but strategic), Go is probably the answer. The possibility space expands so rapidly due to the size of the board that you just can't have deep memorization beyond a few moves.
A space where you can work? Potentially with spaces with others. With break out spaces for working with others, with a few perks thrown in? Call it WeWork?
Tesla also fired a union organizer (while tweeting about how they are free to join a union) [0], banned a journalist from buying a Tesla[1], threatened to sue another journalist[2], and tried to destroy the life of a whistleblower[3].
Retro forums that focus on specific systems (eg, C64 development, NES development, DOS development...) tend to be pretty good as they draw people who are interested in developing for more limited hardware and as such don't mind going deep on technical topics. For more up to date discourse I'm not too sure. Maybe TIGSource forums?
What exactly makes you comment as if woman gaining equality means men have lost something? Surely, in an even society, this is a good headline, unless you're pining for more patriarchal days.
Equal opportunity (not equal outcome) is good. What I'm worried about is that this correlates with the wider societal trend of positive discrimination in favor of women (hence discrimination against men) and dismissal of men and their issues.
If men graduating from college at a higher rate than women, or men earning more than women, is indicative of lack of equality, then wouldn't the opposite hold true - women graduating from college at a higher rate than men, or women earning more than men is indicative of lack of equality?
But it specifically isn't equality, even though there is a narrative that it is. A similar issue is present with kids where boys, who already tend to struggle at school more than girls, aren't encouraged as much and end up not trying as much as the girls do. You can see this in the gender discrepancy of college graduation rates
Which begs the question, why not bank on the current reality where some jobs favor women and some favor men, due to conscious personal choices made by those men and women?
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scott_Adams
(Of particular note: the "Predictions from a stable genius" where he goes truly off the deep end.)