Open-source sucks at UX. I think because there's no community behind open-source UX like there is in the inner workings of systems, where people just want to get shit done.. You have to pay UX developers and designers to do their job, because it's generally not a job you'd do for free or in order to accomplish "something".
> Open-source sucks at UX. I think because there's no community behind open-source UX like there is in the inner workings of systems, where people just want to get shit done.. You have to pay UX developers and designers to do their job, because it's generally not a job you'd do for free or in order to accomplish "something".
Closed source also sucks big at UX (see Office 365 for details). But M$ offers "integration" a thing which OSS cannot offer. Also , having enough lobby (corruption) or market share , the UX does not matter.
As a software developer, I'm writing to benefit me because I use the code I write.
What I write and share is directly re-usable to others.
We can walk a path and share our work, and others can take it and copy it immediately.
Whereas with UX.. Most of the time it's written for the benefit of someone else. And it's not something that can be used elsewhere very easily.. Often needing to be completely re-worked to be useful anywhere else.
You're talking about libraries. And parent answered to message about end user software. Sure, you might use your own end user software, but so can UX designer.
If the designer isn't also a software developer who writes a new application to scratch their UX itch, then they must work with some existing project, which presumably has existing users..
It's probably always going to be harder to contribute design overhauls than bugfixes & features.
Because for programmers coding is a passion. I've met one person in my life with a passion for UX, all the rest really wanted to be doing something else and just do it for pay. Not to say they don't enjoy their work, just that it's not a personal or deep passion.
