Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For Apple, it‘s not about attracting new customers but about reducing costs (on the software side and also in licensing costs for the CPU) to increase profits.


Profits are a factor but Apple has always thought more long term: Intel has been preventing them from shipping things on-time (sometimes year+ delays) and they’re limited to what Intel implements in many areas. It’s not as bad but similar to the way that the Android watch market dried up when Qualcomm chose to keep shipping 2014 chips which ruled out most of what designers might want to build.

This gives Apple complete control of their product direction and especially the ability to build unique features which aren’t easy to match - Dell’s design is limited to the combinations which Intel offers unless they pony up a large amount of R&D and get Microsoft on-board but Apple can customize their integrated chips for the exact thermal/size/power characteristics they need.

That’s a big commitment but it’s something they’ve been very successful at in the mobile space so I wouldn’t bet against them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: