Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems the "horse-drawn carriage" argument is being repeated across multitude of comments posted by your account.

What makes this comparison with nuclear energy even remotely viable?



Much like carriages, more modern alternatives have rendered it obsolete despite the loud voices that continually refuse to accept its eventual extinction.


The only superior potential more modern source of energy we're aware of that can match energy density, resource efficiency and carbon-free characteristics of nuclear fission is nuclear fusion. Other alternatives lose on one or more parameters, especially when it comes to environmental costs.


Maximum possible energy density and resource efficiency are not really considered when designing grids.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: