Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Surely you don't need to?

Just over-expand the mask and let stable diffusion decide what it's going to keep and what it's going to replace.




You'd effectively be trying to do a pixel-by-pixel diffusion strength parameter, which I'm not sure has a coherent interpretation to the algorithm (because it's currently a scalar applied to the run settings).




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: