AWS is _extremely_ customer friendly and if this happened would likely be offering dedicated support to make it right, credits for the business loss, etc.
Google's customer service is the worst I've experienced in the industry (like even speaking to a person is hard). While AWS is some of the best I've received.
I've seen my org send a silly amount of silly questions that were obviously our fault to AWS support and they always took it in stride. We very rarely needed to follow up with our client executive (but they always offer to jump in if necessary). When we did have serious issues, we had no problem scheduling time with the executive managing the product and the engineers that wrote the code.
Meanwhile we can't even get Google to answer an email about serious incidents that were very obviously their fault, much less assign a dedicated human point person (hell with AWS, we even had several backup contacts assigned to cover for vacation time). We were important enough to be featured on their client success frontpage, but that didn't make a difference in support quality we received.
I can't imagine why anyone would risk their business with GCE. Especially since it tends to cost more than AWS these days.
Yes, AWS being patient with both customer fault (common) issues and even out of scope for support tier level is crazy - it’s got to be a purposeful cost center expenditure. I like some things about google w project model but we spend on AWS (not too much).
> AWS is _extremely_ customer friendly and if this happened would likely be offering dedicated support to make it right, credits for the business loss, etc.
It doesn't take much legwork to find counterexamples of that claim, even on HN (see below, I spent 2 minutes searching to find those).
> Google's customer service is the worst I've experienced in the industry (like even speaking to a person is hard). While AWS is some of the best I've received.
This is a bit too hyperbolic for me, but on balance I agree that Amazon has better customer experience than Google. That doesn't really answer what GP is asking, especially given all the posts made about AWS on this very forum that only sometimes get attention.
Not sure what this is about since the link is dead except due to being 5 years old but, based on the upvotes, it's someone failing to get people to have angry opinions about AWS? Not sure how this is about AWS customer service given the context.
So you made a claim that there's "there are plenty, even on HN" and then utterly failed to provide any proof even after trying. Then when called out you blamed the other person for not doing so on your behalf. I'm going to stick with my response.
I'm sure that GCP could turn around their HN customer service reputation, if they wanted to prioritize that.
Though, when it might not be baked into the culture as much as at AWS, I don't know offhand how to reconcile a customer happiness turnaround with the rush to avoid being an also-ran in the AI deployment frenzy.
(Are you going to assign conflicting KPIs in a company that has cultivated a career-driven culture, and hope that individuals strike optimal balances for the company? Or partition the goal assignments to separate teams, when the optimal outcome requires holistic thinking and behavior across teams?)
Wasn’t this supposed to be Kurian’s prerogative—sell enterprise services? Google product seem fine to me, but I agree that they have no customer care DNA. I was expecting someone from the outside to bring it in.
I worked in Kurian’s org at Oracle and I was shocked when Google hired him. OCI was a total disaster at the start. Like embarrassingly bad, they threw most of the original platform in the trash.
AWS is _extremely_ customer friendly and if this happened would likely be offering dedicated support to make it right, credits for the business loss, etc.
Google's customer service is the worst I've experienced in the industry (like even speaking to a person is hard). While AWS is some of the best I've received.